Tag Archive | "Defensemen"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fleury Be Bad

Posted on 28 October 2010 by Jeff Jackson

Again last night Marc-Andre Fleury let in the first shot he faced. But the Penguins roared back to score two short handed goals (on the same Lightning powerplay) and a third goal to rocket ahead to a 3-1 lead. However by the end of the first period the Lightning made it 3-2 and by the time it was all over the Pens lost 4-3.

Fleury was, to be blunt, bad. He seems to be getting worse as the season rolls on an Brent Johnson eats up the minutes in his stead. This leads me to believe that Fleury, who we all know is a great goalie, yes even the Fleury haters know this, simply needs to play more to get into a groove. So let’s play him more.

I also think that it is obvious that the defense seems to be playing differently in front of Fleury than they play in front of Johnson. When Johnson is in net the defense seems much more tight in the defensive zone. They are in position and they are getting to pucks. With Fleury though his different style and skills seem to lead the defensemen to play a little looser in all important areas.

This does not excuse Fleury’s lack luster play. But it puts blame on the entire team where I think it rightfully belongs.

And while we’re at it, let’s talk about the power play shall we?

I am going to bring up again how it is obvious that there is something wrong. And I don’t think it is Sergei Gonchar not being on the blue line either. Yes, last year the Pens power play was better in spurts with Sarge quarterbacking it, but even with him there handling the puck things were still amiss with the man advantage. Well all know it. Don’t deny it.

I still think the problem is Sid and Geno playing together on the same unit. This one constant is becoming more and more obvious as the power play featuring these two superstars (along with a more than highly skilled supporting cast) want to pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass and pass the puck which often leads to turnovers and the puck eventually leaving the zone due to an errant pass.

I know the rationale for putting them on the same unit. I know the theory is that you put your best players together and you get your best power play. But are we perhaps ready to admit that this is not necessarily the case? Are we ready to say that so many skilled players playing together is leading to too much thinking and not enough success?

Sid and Geno have proven to have some chemistry when playing at even strength. But even this has shown to be anything but a sure thing when it comes to generating offense. The power play is an entirely different beast. Last year the trouble was attributed to Sid and Geno fighting to be in the same spot. This year that problem was supposed to be elevated by separating the two. It has not worked however. Could it just be that the chemistry is not there?

While I don’t doubt that if Geno and Sid would hunker down and concentrate on scoring rather than overly thinking about who to pass to next in order to set up the perfect shot the PP it would be very awesome sight to see. However that is not happening. Maybe it is time to try two different units (1 and 1A) with Sid leading one and Geno leading the other. Keeping them both on the ice for nearly two whole minutes isn’t apparently working well enough.

Spare me the complaint about how you decide who is 1 and who is 1A when it comes to the power play. Has there been a problem with Sid being 1 and Geno being 1A (second line) at even strength? No. So let’s at least start looking seriously at the problem. Let’s stop stroking egos for fear of offending someone. These two are making $8.7 million each. If Dan Bylsma wants them to skate around the ice in pink tu tus they had better do so proudly asking only one question. That question is what exact shade of pink Coach Disco would prefer.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Simon Despres Makes A Case

Posted on 26 September 2010 by Jeff Jackson

Simon Despres, Pittsburgh’s first round pick (and 30th overall) in 2009, finally got some game ice time last night against Columbus.  During his just over seventeen minutes of playing time which included 3:35 of penalty killing work, Despres made a good case that he should be on the Penguins roster come opening day as their seventh defenseman.  The problem is, in all likelihood, is that he will not be.

At age 19 he will likely be sent back to the minors for some more honing and considering the other defensemen in camp likely to make the roster even putting him on the team as the seventh defenseman seems like a long shot.

Orpik, Goligoski, Letang, Michalek and Martin are locks for the starting roster.  The inside track for the sixth and seventh slots goes to Lovejoy, Brian Strait, veteran Andrew Hutchinson and Corey Potter.  So back to the minors it is most likely for Despres unless he can beat out three of those four.  And frankly unless he is going to be the sixth defenseman on the roster sending him down makes the most sense.

He needs playing time to further hone his talents and as a seventh defenseman he will not get it often enough if he stays in Pittsburgh.

Against a Columbus team stacked with young first round picks with worlds of talent Despres stood his ground with a mix of physical and smart play at both ends of the ice.  He faltered at times as any young defenseman would but his performance was solid and he was one the ice for two of Pittsburgh’s three goals (earning a +2) and had four shots.

If the Penguins want to make a splash Despres perhaps should get his shot to play full time but there are other players ahead of him that will get that chance instead.  Only if they falter does it look likely that Despres will get the chance he seems to be earning.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What Mario’s Statue Should Be Like

Posted on 19 July 2010 by Jeff Jackson

According to sources the final plans for a statue of Mario Lemieux to grace the front of the new Consol Energy Center are complete. The only thing missing is the statue itself. Someone within the Pens organization last year told me what they thought the statue would be. I have heard a couple rumors about what it will be now. I don’t really care.

Lemieux deserves a statue as the great player he was. Even if he did jerk the fans of Pittsburgh around when the whole concept of a new arena was in doubt.

Whatever the statue ultimately looks like, this is what the statue should look like.

In the center there should be Mario Lemieux, triumphant after scoring his very first NHL goal. Around him, at his feet should be four or five children who are now NHL stars that grew up watching him play, looking up in awe. They should each be wearing Jerseys with their names and numbers on the back but no team logos on the front. One of those kids, and he should stand out from the rest, should be Sidney Crosby.

Do this and you successfully pay tribute to Mario’s great playing career and manage to make a statement about the impact Mario had on the game off the ice and above and beyond scoring goals at will against hapless defensemen. You even tie the old nicely in with the new.

Just my opinion.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Much Is Gonchar Worth?

Posted on 16 June 2010 by Jeff Jackson

If you are a Penguins fan and don’t like Sergei Gonchar then there is something really wrong with you and your brain is not wired right. I remember when the Penguins signed Gonchar a few years back too many people ballyhooed about the acquisition because they knew so little about the skill Sarge brought to the blue line. They remembered he was a Capital and hated him because of it.

But like it or not for the better part of his career in the NHL Sergei Gonchar has been one of elite offense defensemen if not the cream of that crop and the cherry on top too. Especially where the power play was concerned there was no finer player to quarterback the slaughter. His offensive prowess has never been in doubt except to those uninitiated in the finer points of hockey.

This year however things seem different. Perhaps it is age and two grueling seasons on a team who went deep into the playoff playing a demanding offensive style that has taken its toll on Gonch. Perhaps it is just an off year. Perhaps it is just misconceptions about exactly what he has accomplished. But right now, with Sergei Gonchar looking for a new contract things just don’t seem to rosy for one of the top offensive d-men to ever play the game.

In 62 regular season games Gonchar had 11 goals and 39 assists. Unfortunately he was also a -4 but he was tied for third in scoring on the team. And the guy he was tied with, Alex Ponikarovsky did most of his scoring elsewhere before joining the Penguins. In the playoffs Gonchar had 2 goals, 10 assists and was +4 in 13 games. I’ll take that from a defenseman any day of the week and twice on Sunday. So it cannot be his offensive stats that are the problem. What does seems to be the problem is that his offensive output is leading to a defensive lapse. That’s not good even for an offensive defenseman.

Probably though the biggest reason people are down on Gonchar this year is the power play which was pathetic 26th. Gonchar is an easy target considering that he plays most of every power play for the Penguins. But so too do Crosby and Malkin. I think the problems with the man advantage are deeper than Gonchar although he is an easy scapegoat. I still maintain that it is long past time to split up the dynamic duo and have them each run their own unit because it is obvious that both Sid and Geno want to play the same spot on the ice making it very easy to defend. And teams have defended it well. But this is not say that Gonchar is not blameless either.

I like Gonchar. I bought a number 55 jersey when he joined the team. My friend John liked the acquisition of Ziggy Palffy that year better. Good thing he didn’t invest the money in a #33 sweater.

But even though I like him it does not mean that I am interested in giving him the farm to stay. Gonchar made five million this past year. That is a hefty sum and one that he has been worth. But this year, especially with the power play faltering, the Penguins cannot really afford to invest in a multiyear contract for Gonch at that rate. Hate to say it but I think age is catching up to him. He is still a way above average offensive D-man but I do not know that he is the same guy I drafted quickly and often every year in fantasy hockey because of his skills.

Is he worth what Letang just got? I’d say yes for two years. But it would be a pay cut to what Sarge would likely get on the open market.

Honestly I don’t care what Gonchar does. If he wants the money he wants the money. Can’t fault him for that. But what if he takes that money and doesn’t win? I don’t know about you but being a richer loser doesn’t seem like much fun when you can be a slightly less rich winner.

If I were the Penguins the deal would be three years at an average of 2.75 million a year (3 mill this year, 2.75 next and 2.5 in year three). Take it or leave it. Time is not on Sarge’s side. He’s 36 and I think he’s got three good years left in him. Not great years, but good ones. Plus as long as he is on the bench I have a feeling that Letang and Goligoski will never get the ice time they need to develop in the Power Play quarterbacks they can become.

Comments (0)